Communications these days…

The timing of Fandango’s Provocative Question this week:

Do you have a preference with respect to the length of blog posts you read? Does the number of words in a post affect how you read it or even if you will read it? What is your average post length?

…is interesting because I recently decided that I would try to write a longer post on an issue of our times every week, or two…or three.

This is one of them. I answer Fandango’s question, but I also explore some thoughts related to why along the way…because I think they might affect most every communication these days.

Engagement not length

How long a post should be, in my opinion, is as long as is needed to express one’s thought.

If something catches my imagination or gets me thinking It can be pretty long. I don’t like rambling, but some thoughts take more explanation than others. And I never look at or think about word count.

and yet…

We live in an AD/HD world.

Twitter has conditioned us to 140 characters or less of communication at a time. I say “us” even though I do not use the platform, because I believe that the format has changed how we communicate in ways beyond the platform. We want things shorter than we used to.

When Twitter first came out I had two contradictory thoughts

  1. The last thing this world needed was a bunch of short bumper sticker slogans shat out while people were on the potty.
  2. That it might make people more erudite. We might get better about editing and more careful and accurate in their use of words.

The net result of the Twitter phenomenon is that we are unwilling to give complex issues the thought they deserve; we often try to simplify things that shouldn’t be simplified; and we seem to think that a snarky knee jerk response is reasonable in response to anything.

…then there is the business of visibility: Search Engine Optimization (SEO)

In thinking about the length of posts one cannot ignore the Google-monster. There are parameters for distribution of our content. Yoast SEO plug in recommends a minimum of 300 words. This is driven by the Google-monster’s algorithm.

The SEO algorithm also affects the wording and content of posts.

I use Yoast SEO on theSquirrelChase.com, my other web site. It is mainly accommodating the Google-monster. The plug-in evaluates “readability” and SEO separately, giving you little hints about how you can toe the line.

The readability aspect tends to make you use short sentences and stay away from many big words. There is nothing inherently wrong with this. It helps me to stop and reconsider my choice of words. But sometimes I feel like it changes my voice. It also has a weird hangup on “transition words” and doesn’t like it if too many sentences start with the same word. It gets its virtual panties in a wad when I make a list of steps, which I often do, since I mostly post how-to posts on that site. It also puts a crimp in using the literary device of repetition.

The Search Engine Optimization section really bugs me. They want you to choose a key phrase. Then you are supposed to have that phrase in your title, the first paragraph, the subheadings, the alt attributes of some, but not all, photos and sprinkled throughout the text at a specific rate.

I really struggle with this. Back in the day I was taught to have a point, but to express it in a variety of ways to make it more accessible to a variety of people, and help to refine it. It feels artificial to keep plugging in the same phrase over and over, and I think it turns off the reader. I usually make an effort, then tell the computer to take a long hike off a short pier (often out loud, and sometimes not so politely).

I can see why the Google-monster like this. It makes it easy for the algorithm to know how to categorize. But it does encourage all posts to follow a similar pattern.

The reason I bring this up

I feel like the way I communicate has been changed by these two factors. They are examples of the way I feel like the world is training us to be less effective at communication. I wonder if others feel the same way: Do you think that you have changed the way you word things because of them? Do you notice these factors in the posts you read?

Personally

I follow about 100 blogs, the most I can handle , plus I pop around a bit. I typically read the first part of every post in my feed then decide if I want to continue based on interest and how much time I have available.

According to WordPress my average post length has been 200 words in 2022 (year to date). My average has been consistently in that range since I started this blog in 2014. Last year was my lowest average, 118 words per post, and 2015 was the highest at 222 words per post.

I don’t think averages are meaningful, because of the way I post. I either post pictures or a wordy post reminiscing or reflection. If I do a challenge that has you post a photo every day (like the Squares) for a month it biases the average because I do often just post a photo.

4 thoughts on “Communications these days…”

  1. I really agree that a post length
    Should be
    “as long as is needed to express one’s thought”-
    And enjoyed your share on the google/monster suggestions – that is new to me – even tho I have heard some of it before

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Thanks for joining in on the provocative question. I agree with you that, from the perspective as a writer of blog posts, the post length should be whatever the blogger feels that he or she needs to say what they have to say. As a reader of blog posts, though, given that there are only so many hours in a day that I can devote to both writing, reading, and commenting on blog posts, size does matter. I’m less likely to carefully read longer posts (e.g., more than 500 or 600 words) than I am posts half that size. It’s mostly a matter of how to invest my finite time available.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. This proves to show how hard and complicated standards gets over time. Where you not only have to focus on content but many other factors that creates success. Especially the current trend if SEO and algorithms that gets our posts across.

    I hope it’ll be able to ease the mind of bloggers in the near future in terms of blogging standards.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Hmm. This is a difficult post to respond to. In answer to the first question, posts I read in their entirety are generally short. Occasionally, a political site I follow might take me through a number of paragraphs, as it seeks to enlighten me or challenge me to action.
    One writing blog has me always read the first section, as it is witty, motivating and has one clear point, or target. The rest of the post will have exerpts from which I can select, but rarely do .
    Like Fandango, time is at the centre of my reading choices. I am a doer, and it’s hard to read while moving.
    Most of the other points you raise bring out the English teacher in me, and I could continue your conversational voice, discussing them from my point of view. However (transitional word), I think you are aware of your voice and when it is genuine. If the purpose of your recent decision is to write posts about issues of our times, then the only parameter seems to be ‘issues of our times’ .
    Happy blogging.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply to Richie .Travis Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s